New York Medical Malpractice Lawyer Blog

A New York Medical Malpractice Lawyer explains that a lawsuit is taking place against a Chinese hospital due to a medically necessary procedure experiencing extreme delays. The lawsuit is being brought against the hospital by the girl’s father. The father says that the delay in the procedure caused further damage to his daughter’s health and mental abilities.
The girl was under medical care because she was experiencing bleeding in the tissue of her brain. Her father says that the hospital she was at should have performed the surgery almost two years sooner than it actually took place. This delay was unreasonable, unnecessary and the cause of the daughter’s current condition. A New York City Malpractice Lawyer explains that in the United States this would certainly be valid grounds for a lawsuit.
The father feels that the Chinese legal system has failed him and not paid enough attention to his complaints; the father has pursued the case through several levels of the justice system. The father says that his accusations of malpractice were ignored, several witnesses were not allowed to testify and that evidence proving that the delays in care were unnecessary and excessive was purposefully destroyed.
The daughter, who was 15-years-old at the time she experience the initial brain hemorrhaging, currently needs fulltime medical attention and help with activities of daily living. The man is suing for damages and, he says, to obtain justice for his daughter, whose future has been destroyed. He would have a much easier time in the U.S. In New York City or Brooklyn, a case like this would not be held up by the government.
Though the man remains doubtful that he will receive a favorable ruling or that the case will even make it a hearing, he continues to pursue the case. The case faces several hurdles. The man is seeking lawsuits against both the hospital and the attending physician. It is unclear at this time what the man hopes to obtain in monetary compensation, or if he hopes to receive any financial benefit at all from the case beyond what he needs to support his daughter.
There were no statements available from the lawyers involved in the case. The Chinese government has also not commented on the case, although there is legislation proposed which would regulate medical malpractice cases.

Continue reading " New York City Medical Malpractice Lawyer Evaluates Chinese Malpractice Case " »

Between the years of 1997 to 2004 a lady attended Reflections Breast Health Center to receive a mammogram every single year. The clinic reviewed all of the mammograms and she was told that they were all normal. A mammogram which was done in 2003 was later reviewed by another doctor.

In the middle of 2004 the woman found that there was a lump in one of her breasts. Her Physician told her to visit the Reflections center again for further diagnostics. The tests discovered that it was highly likely the lump was malignant. The lump doubled in size over one year. A biopsy was conducted and it was shown that it was in fact malignant.

The New York Medical Malpractice Lawyer goes on to say that the patients doctor explained the possible treatment options and that it would probably involve lymph node dissection, radio-therapy and treating with hormones. The doctor wanted to find out how far the cancer had spread by checking nearby lymph nodes.

The patient had the lump removed, chemotherapy treatment, radio-therapy and also started treatments for hormone therapy said the New York Medical Malpractice Lawyer.

The patient then tried to file a claim alleging that the radiology made her injury worse than it was before. In the second claim the patient suggested that the doctor had not performed the routine checkups properly, otherwise the cancer should have been detected sooner. In the final claim the NY Medical Malpractice Lawyer states that the doctor was too slow in diagnosing cancer which allowed it to spread.

The delay in treatment allowed the cancer to become more serious and spread much quicker than it would of done if treated earlier. This also reduced the chances of curing the cancer, it also lead to emotional distress, physical pain, and emotional suffering. It also prevented her from living a normal life. Lawyers in The Bronx and in Queens have brought these kind of cases very often.

The trial found that the case should fail under the medical malpractice regulations in Ohio. This is because the growth of cancer should not be a physical injury which can be compensated. However, a later review of the case found that the patients claims for emotional distress were valid.

Continue reading " Ohio SC reinstates medical malpractice claim " »

Medical malpractice happens every day; it's just that most people aren't too concerned with fighting it. Many pensioners try to find a NY Medical Malpractice Lawyer to handle their wife’s death. However, few lawyers would actually want to take this case on because the rewards are not high enough.

But, when someone with more earning potential dies like a doctor, then the wrongful death lawsuit is a real possibility. The doctor died on 23rd April 2010. He was a 35 year old, skilled neurosurgeon. He just got offered a job at a local practice which could see him earning over $2 million per year. This is a huge sum of money, which means his wrongful death is worth a lot of money to any good New York Medical Malpractice Lawyer.

The family of the doctor is currently suing the hospital and the doctors involved in the treatment. Many people believe that doctors look after their own kind, and you might expect that he would of received the very best medical care available. The doctor had been vomiting and had a fever and diarrhea. By 11 PM in the evening he died.

It's thought that the cause of death was sepsis. This is a serious infection which can kill by causing septic shock.

The lawsuit which has been filed alleges that the doctor did not receive the correct treatment for his illness. When the correct treatment was chosen there were several delays which made the condition worse.

The NY Medical Malpractice Lawyer called on two medical experts to assist the case. One was an expert in emergency medicine, and the other an expert in sepsis.

Although the doctor was seriously ill, the emergency doctors did not treat him as such. They did not provide him with the necessary treatment quickly enough.

The level of care was also called into question. The emergency doctors did not check in on the patient nearly as often as they needed to. The ER nurses also neglected to take good care of him. The experts believe that the patient would have been able to survive if he received the right treatment quickly enough.

Continue reading " Doctors Death Lawsuit Could Cost Millions of Dollars " »

A new Michigan State bill may help lessen the amount of medical malpractice lawsuits. This new measure would allow a doctor to say “I’m sorry” without it being an admission of guilt when procedures go wrong. A NYC Medical Malpractice Lawyer says that doctors see it as a step in the right direction.

A doctor with the Michigan State Medical Society has said that anything you say when dealing with patients and their families can be held against you. If you admit that you’re sorry that something has went wrong, many people see that as an implication of guilt, or that you did something wrong during the procedure. Currently these heartfelt apologies can be seen as admissions of guilt to a wrongdoing on the doctor’s part. Anesthesia errors can occur at any hospital and often do in Nassau, Long Island where a lawyer familiar with the law should be called.

According to a New York Medical Malpractice Lawyer, a new proposed bill states that saying “I’m Sorry” when something goes wrong would no longer be an admission of guilt. 35 states already have what are called “I’m Sorry” laws in place, and reports have shown that the number of medical malpractice lawsuits have decreased in a lot of those states.

The hope is that fewer lawsuits may eventually lead to lower insurance premiums as well. But first the Michigan State Medical Society just wants to help protect the health care workers and their families. Although this law would apply to all health care professionals, it would not apply to people who apologize and admit they’re guilty as well.

Continue reading " Apologies Prevent Medical Lawsuits, Reports New York Medical Malpractice " »

Some physicians in the Nevada area are fretting the possibility of the law limiting pay outs for damages on medical malpractice suits, will soon be overturned based on a pending case where a woman wrongfully lost her life and left her family behind, said a N York Medical Malpractice Lawyer.

The woman, who died in 2007, was allegedly incorrectly diagnosed by a doctor and died shortly after. She left behind six children and a husband. The doctors involved in the case admitted no fault. These kinds of cases are often reported in Manhattan and Westchester.

The Nevada Supreme Court is in discussions about the current law regarding damages for pain and suffering, which states, “In an action for injury or death against a provider of health care based upon professional negligence, the injured plaintiff may recover non-economic damages, but the amount of non-economic damages awarded in such an action must not exceed $350,000.”

A NY Medical Malpractice Lawyer explained that the family’s counsel feels the $350,000 should be awarded to each family member involved in the case, which would bring these damages to $5.6 million. This far exceeds the current $350,000 limit.

In response to this case and it’s possibility for overturning the law, several Medical Associations and Societies have petitioned the Supreme Court asking that the law stay the same.

Doctors fear the changing of the law will limit their ability to practice medicine at all due to the increase costs.

“If I have to double my malpractice insurance because of this lawsuit, I'll probably have to leave town. A lot of doctors will be hurt,” one doctor said.

Continue reading " Doctors are worried over possible increased costs associated with Medical Malpractice Suits reported a New York Medical Malpractice Lawyer " »

A New York Medical Malpractice Attorney explains that a doctor from Ohio was found to be responsible for medical negligence concerned with the birth of a baby girl.

The trial took a day and a half and various expert witnesses were called to the stand. It was decided that the doctor was responsible and the hospital was ordered to pay $13.9 million in damages.

The girl who is the subject of the case is now ten years old. She suffered from cerebral Palsy which was directly caused by the doctor being negligent and not acting quickly enough. It is alleged that the doctors actions during the birth deprived the baby of oxygen which lead to the complications.

The patient visited her family doctor on a regular basis for checkups. These checkups allowed her to check how her pregnancy was and that everything was going properly. The hospital ordered tests which showed her baby had a fairly low heart rate. The doctor decided that it was in the babies best interests to induce labor early.

The parents agreed and had an emergency Caesarean section. This is where the baby is delivered through surgery. However, after labor was induced the doctor changed his mind and decided not to do the C-section. Expert witnesses said that the lack of oxygen to the brain of the baby caused the child to suffer from cerebral palsy.

The expert witness also gave further details that showed the child also suffered another cerebral palsy when contractions were induced. The doctor argued that she never even though about doing a C-section because there was no reason to think that the baby had anything wrong with it.

The New York City Medical Malpractice Lawyer says the family is arguing that if a c-section was performed quickly that the baby would have been completely normal. The complications during her birth were completely avoidable.

Cerebral Palsy is a medical condition which can affect the way the brain works and impair several functions including learning, hearing, thinking and walking. Many of the problems which cause this can be avoided.

Continue reading " $13.9 Million Is Awarded In Birth Injury Lawsuit " »

America's healthcare system is under continuous reform and improvement. There have been many debates over the years about reforms which could be used to make the healthcare system much better and more effective.

One of the most controversial issues is that malpractice suits could be increasing our annual healthcare costs, explains a New York Medical Malpractice Lawyer. The debate has to consider the dangers to patient safety, and the doctors wellbeing.

Many people who are trying to reform the medical malpractice lawsuit procedure argue that they are pushing qualified doctors away. Many of these people will also suggest that medical malpractice cases are the main reason why health insurance is rising so steeply. However, this certainly isn't true.

The NYC Medical Malpractice Lawyer explains that the cost of medical malpractice cases only affects a very small proportion of health care costs. This is mainly because these malpractice costs are much less common than many people assume. In 2004 the cost of malpractice cases was under 2% of the total spending on healthcare. This means that the costs of malpractice cases are unlikely to push up insurance costs.

Other people have looked at the topic of medical negligence in more detail. They have suggested that this is costing more because doctors are over-cautious. They order more tests than they require so that they are not liable. Again, this only pushes up health care costs by a very small amount.

Although many hospitals have to deal with a few malpractice cases every year, their profits are always rising. This means that the malpractice claims are not damaging the industry. The profits rose by 56% during 2009. Health insurance companies also made more profit than before, and many Americans found their monthly payments for health insurance actually fell.

Health care is something that is very important to everyone in America. This is why the debates will continue to rage on forever. When looking at the reform topics, it is important to fully understand both sides of the story. This will give you an understanding of the real costs of malpractice cases.

Continue reading " Malpractice Suits are not Increasing Health Care Cots as Much as Some People Imagine " »

Medical malpractice cases are costing doctors and hospitals millions of dollars every year. A New York Medical Malpractice Lawyer explains that this is making it much less desirable to become a doctor in the first place. Many doctors will also leave states which have high cases of medical malpractice cases because of the high costs.

The doctor says that people have been trying to revise the healthcare malpractice cases for a very long time. Around 30 years ago a Law professor suggested a series of alternatives which could be used to manage the liability of medical providers.

The idea proposed by the lecturer was liability by contract. This was a much safer condition for patients and doctors alike. The liability by contract should work by deciding exactly what will happen if there are any problems with the treatment before anything begins. This means that it will be much easier to resolve the cases.

This is a very common feature of many other types of contracts and relationships. However, when it comes to the medical industry this type of contract is never heard of. By mentioning dispute resolution procedures in the contract it would be much easier to manage any problems as and when they arrive. Cosmetic surgery is the cause of many malpractice suits.

The New York Medical Malpractice Lawyer mentions that hospitals have tried similar things in the past. They have asked many patients to sign disclaimers which waved the patients right to sue the hospital if anything went wrong. However, these were said to be worthless because judges frequently dismissed them from court. The basis for dismissing these was because the judges decided they were not informed about what they were signing.

People have suggested voluntary contracts which doctors and hospitals can decide whether or not to use. These no fault contracts will allow families and patients to be compensated for deaths and injuries. Lawyers and doctors in Brooklyn and The Bronx have discussed these no fault contracts for some time.

At the moment, if a person feels that they have had poor medical treatment and want to get compensation then they will have to sue them and file a case in court. However, by implementing these contracts it will be much easier for people to get the compensation if they deserve it.

Continue reading " Suitable Alternatives to Medical Malpractice Cases " »

Dr. Gilbert Lederman had heavily advertised his medical treatments for cancer on infomercials in Italy. He spoke about his fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery, which is an option for patients who have inoperable cancer. The radiation, received over a period of days, does not cure the cancer, but instead mutates the DNA enough so it cannot hold water cells or reproduce anymore. Guiseppa Bono was one of his patients. She contacted him after seeing his infomercial. She was then screened by Salvatore Conte, and told she was a candidate for treatment. Bono flew from Italy to Staten Island University Hospital, located at 475 Seaview Avenue Staten Island, NY 10305, for treatment. She received radiation treatment from two doctors before leaving to go home to Italy. Sadly, Bono passed away a year later reports a NYC Medical Malpractice Lawyer.
It was later found out that Conte was not a medical doctor, and argued that Lederman should not have been using him to screen potential patients. Lederman is allegedly also claimed to treat George Harrison, as a way to attract clients and boost his own medical reputation. They also claim Lederman never tested to see if she actually had cancer before administering the radiation treatment to Bono. After receiving two treatments, Bono went back to Italy. Unfortunately, she passed away a year later. Evidence suggests that she did not suffer from pancreatic cancer, but from an inflammation of the pancreas. Her family has now filed a lawsuit in Brooklyn Federal Court, located at 225 Cadman Plaza East, Brooklyn NY 11201.

Continue reading " A Staten Island Cancer Specialist has been sued for alleged Medical Malpractice on an Italian Cancer Patient. An NYC Medical Malpractice Lawyer should be consulted. " »

The parents of a five year old boy filed a malpractice suit due to injuries sustained during the birth of their son. The case has been settled after being in court for just three days explains a prominent New York Medical Malpractice Lawyer.

The New York City Medical Malpractice Lawyer was told that the parents of the child were awarded $8.5 million to cover medical costs and care required due to mistakes made when their don was born. The five year old boy still suffers from seizures and is not able to walk unassisted. The boy will need medical treatment for his entire life because he suffered from brain damage.

Everything seemed fine when the delivery started explained the Manhattan Medical Malpractice Lawyer. However, according to medical reports and records at 9 AM concerns were raised about the heart rate meter dropping significantly. The heart rate of the baby was originally at 140 beats per minute, but fell as low as 60 beats per minute.

The heart rate being as low as 60 beats per minute is very serious and can cause long lasting damage. The nurse continued to monitor the situation but waited for half an hour before alerting the obstetrician. This was found out by looking at telephone records which show when she started making phone calls to the obstetrician.

The attending obstetrician arrived 22 minutes after he was called. However, the caesarean section was not carried out until 11AM. The procedure was very quick and only took around 4 minutes to take the baby out. If this was performed immediately without the delays that were really experienced, then the family could have been facing a very different future.

The New York Medical Malpractice Lawyer explains that an expert witness was called to give evidence. They said that if the C-section was performed earlier then it would be much more likely that the baby would not of been harmed. The birth injuries were preventable if the doctors acted quickly. Lawyers in Manhattan, New York City have stated the same case.

Continue reading " Parents Settle $8.5 million in Birth Injury Malpractice " »

A group of prominent NYC Medical Malpractice Lawyers has filed a case on behalf of the spouse of a patient who died after knee surgery. The patient passed away two days after the surgery due to an injury of the brain.

The patient had surgery on his left knee in April 2010 in Northwest Georgia Orthopedic Surgery Center. The entire medical team was made aware that the patient suffered from obstructive sleep apnea. This put him at a higher risk than normal for various complications after the surgery.

The New York Medical Malpractice Lawyers explain that the doctors then decided that the patient was fit enough to return home. It is alleged that the doctors did not correctly administer drugs. He was given Dilaudid even though he was not in any pain when he was submitted.

The nurses helped the patient to get dressed. Then his wife collected him at around 11:30, the timing is important because it is before the drugs he was given actually had time to take effect. The doctors also failed to evaluate his condition before discharging him.

The medical records, which were available, showed that the patient had only spent around 30 minutes in the recovery ward after recovering from the anesthetic. Around 45 minutes after being picked up by his wife and while still on his way home he suffered a fatal heart attack and was admitted to hospital. He died two weeks later.

The New York Medical Malpractice Lawyer handling the case explains that the two drugs administered to manage pain can cause respiratory depression; the risk of this happening is more serious when the patient also suffers from sleep apnea. Normal guidelines suggest that patients with sleep apnea which have this drug should be monitored every three hours, and should only be discharged when there is no risk of their condition deteriorating.

Both the doctor, anesthetist and the hospital where the procedure tool place are all mentioned in the medical malpractice case. All of the defendants have denied any responsibility in the case and the trial is still ongoing. The wrong medication is something which happens in many hospitals, including those in Queens, New York City.

Continue reading " Patient Dies after Routine Surgery " »

A new television ad which has recently started airing on the internet sees a doctor speaking out about a bill which is planned to limit the rights of patients who are injured. The New York Medical Malpractice Lawyer states that this is designed to promote the awareness of medical malpractice claims.

The doctor featured in the ad talks of his wife and how she was disfigured as a result of an operating room fire which could have been prevented. He criticizes senate bill 33 which as the NY City Medical Malpractice Lawyer explains puts a limit on how much people can claim. This is because it treats every malpractice case the same and applies the same limit on all of them.

One version of the ad can be seen on the internet and has also been shown on TV throughout the state. The doctor keeps saying that operating room fires are avoidable. His wife was undergoing a simple outpatient procedure but the fire caused disfigurement. He argues that if the hospital maintained the operating room correctly that these fires should never happen. The senate voted to cut the levels of damages awarded to people who had been disfigured as a result of malpractice.

The doctor gives this story a very emotional and real feel that most people don't experience. Nobody can put a cap on the pain a person experiences and so there should be no level on the amount of compensation that they can receive. Doctors in Westchester and Long island have presented the same case for patients.

There have also been a few other doctors which have spoken negatively about Senate Bill 33. It is suggested by some that the cap will reduce the medical care quality which is given to people in North Carolina.

Both of these doctors show that every case is different and should not be treated the same. Everybody's injuries are unique and they will need to learn the facts about each case and decide the compensation accordingly.

There is a lot of opposition against Senate Bill 33 as it is correctly argued by many people that no two medical malpractice cases are the same. The arbitrary cap which applies to all cases is unfair. People have also shown that the same levels of compensation should not be used for cases which lead to death, disfigurement and emotional distress.

Continue reading " Doctor Speaks Out Against Medical Malpractice Bill " »

A New York Medical Malpractice Lawyer explains that a lawsuit filed for a patient suffering from sleep apnea that was prescribed Percocet and Dilaudid could of lead to his death. The patient was undergoing routine knee replacement surgery and the two drugs were administered. The usage of these drugs should be monitored closely when the patient also has sleep apnea.

The family of the patient has filed a wrongful death lawsuit under the advice of their NY Medical Malpractice Lawyer. The patient suffered from a heart attack while he was traveling to his home. He was transported to hospital but died two days after as a direct result of the heart attack.

The patient underwent the routine surgery in April 2010. The entire medical staff was aware that the patient suffered from sleep apnea and needed specialist care. The surgery was completely successful and the patient was then transferred to the recovery unit for anesthesia, where he seemed to be making a good recovery.

Almost as soon as the patient reached the recovery unit he was discharged again. The doctor authorized his release. Although he was not thought to be in pain, the nurses in the recovery unit administered Dilaudid and Percocet. Anyone with any medical experience should know the risks of using this medication on a patient which has obstructive sleep apnea. The correct procedures were not followed, but doctors discharged him because he seemed ok.

He was helped to get dressed and then his wife collected him at 11:20AM. This meant that he was collected before the drugs had actually had any effect on him. While the patient was checked after having the drugs, no other evaluations were ever conducted by any doctors or nurses. This was a major failing of the health center. If this type of malpractice takes place in The Bronx or Queens, a local attorney should be contacted.

Both of these drugs are used to treat pain. They are known to cause or worsen respiratory depression. This is much more likely in patients which suffer from obstructive sleep apnea. The patients should be monitored for at least 3 hours after receiving the medication and should not be released until after this period.

Continue reading " Routine Knee Surgery Kills Patient " »

A medical malpractice case was filed against a hospital in Connecticut for not preventing a patient from committing suicide. The case went to court and a jury ruled that the hospital was not liable. However, an appeal has decided to throw the jury verdict out.

The New York Medical Malpractice Attorney handling the case explains that the reason the Jury's verdict is being ignored is because the verdict could have been biased. The judge failed to ask the jury whether or not they read a newspaper article relating to the case, and whether or not it affected their opinions.

The newspaper article was published a few weeks before the start of the trial. It is believed that many of the members of the jury read this. It could have quite easily influenced their opinion. Hospitals all over in places like Staten Island and The Bronx must protect themselves against law suits like this one.

All of this then leads the court to order a re-trial in the malpractice suit. The NYC Medical Malpractice Lawyer explains that the woman was being treated at the Psychiatric hospital in 2002 for depression. The 41 year old patient died shortly after being admitted as she hung herself.

The Silver Hill Hospital is well known because it is so popular with many celebrities and has an excellent reputation.

The jury originally found that the hospital and doctor were not liable because they were not negligent. However, a public ruling recently said that the judge should of asked whether or not the members of the jury read the article.

While the article was not accurate in all of the details, the appeals court argued that it could affect a persona emotions relating to the case. The New York Medical Malpractice Lawyer says that this is a valid case for a retrial.

The executor of the diseased patient’s estate said that he was happy with the ruling as it mad their case much stronger. The argument is whether the jury members will still be fair even after reading the article.

The lawyer for the hospital said that it was very likely the hospital would appeal the case. The hospital is sure that the article did not cause any bias because much of the content was mentioned in the trial proceedings.

Continue reading " Jury's Verdict in Suicide Case Ignored in Case " »

A New York Medical Malpractice Lawyer explains that a court ordered a new malpractice trial against Silver Hill Hospital on Monday. The reason for this is because the judge did not ask the jurors whether they read the newspaper story and were influenced by it. This meant that the verdict of the jury was less reliable.

The New York Medical Malpractice Lawyer explains that the original suit was filed against the psychiatrist and the hospital when a middle aged woman died. The patient committed suicide by hanging herself at the medical facility where she was undergoing treatment. She was being treated for a personality disorder and clinical depression.

The Silver Hill Hospital is a very well-known medical facility which has been open for over 80 years. Many famous people have visited the center for psychiatric treatment over the years and it has a very good reputation.

The estate of the diseased lady filed the suit. When the jury found that the hospital was not liable, the executor of the estate appealed the verdict. This was because it was possible that the verdict of the jury was compromised by the newspaper article.

The appeal was based on the fact that the judge did not follow the request of asking whether jurors had read the New York Times story which was related to the case. This could have influenced them which is the reason why the courts verdict was thrown out explains the New York Medical Malpractice Lawyer

It is expected that the attorney for Silver Hill hospital will appeal the ruling next week. The hospitals lawyers disagree with the ruling and will be filing a new suit early in the week. Hospitals in Suffolk County, Long Island have their own attorneys to defend cases like this.

The newspaper story was published a few weeks before various pieces of evidence were found. The story could of quite easily influenced the opinions of the members of the jury.

The doctor who admitted the patient to the hospital ordered that the bathroom door was locked because of suicide attempts on previous occasions. The next day supervision was reduced and the bathroom unlocked. The patient hung herself over the bathroom door.

Continue reading " New Trial against Silver Hill Hospital Ordered by Court " »

In this case, the father of a brain damaged baby filed a medical malpractice lawsuit against the attending doctor. In the original trial, the court found the doctor guilty of malpractice and granted a motion to set aside the damage award of $1,500,000, because it was not enough. A new trial was ordered to set damages.
On appeal, the court held there was plenty of evidence to show that the on call attending doctor didn’t properly supervise the treatment offered by his residents during the birth of the baby in this case. They further held his malpractice was substantial and the proximate cause of the baby’s severe brain damage, explained the New York Medical Malpractice Lawyer Malpractice can take place anywhere like Brooklyn, New York and is likely to end in a similar award to the victim.
In handing down the court’s decision, the Supreme Court Appellate judges also fund that the damages awarded initially deviated substantially from what would be a reasonable damage award, in light of the extent of the baby’s brain damage. However, they also found that setting aside the verdict as a result of juror confusion and ambiguity was not the right thing to do.
When the plaintiff’s son was born, he sustained severe, life-altering brain damage as a direct result of the negligence of the attending physician present at the time of birth. The doctor did not pay attention to what his interns were doing and didn’t check the level of care provided to the mother in this case, reported the New York Medical Malpractice Lawyer.

Continue reading " Brain damage at birth severely harms baby " »